Proposed 9th team
Proposed 9th team
These players still need a team, I suggest they all band together, and form this competitive roster:
Headhunter
Milk Man
Myrkridon
Shadow
Spooky
Toxyn
Nitro
Arsenal
Acab
Headhunter
Milk Man
Myrkridon
Shadow
Spooky
Toxyn
Nitro
Arsenal
Acab
Re: Proposed 9th team
more than 9 teams would be better
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: 20 Feb 2013, 05:49
- Contact:
Re: Proposed 9th team
Ageha is on the cards. I just sent a reminder to ginga and he said he knows about it and needs to think it through.par73 wrote:more than 9 teams would be better
Re: Proposed 9th team
Hey ! I wanna win, not just take second place with Myrk.thisforumsucks wrote:These players still need a team, I suggest they all band together, and form this competitive roster:
Headhunter
Milk Man
Myrkridon
Shadow
Spooky
Toxyn
Nitro
Arsenal
Acab
jk
Re: Proposed 9th team
If the amount of teams is restricted to 8 then why not increase the amount of players allowed to register with a team (to 16 or something)? Unless there is still a shortage of teams or teams with players?
-
- Posts: 1694
- Joined: 15 Nov 2012, 15:38
- Contact:
Re: Proposed 9th team
there is no such restriction... the more teams, the better.
Re: Proposed 9th team
For the record, this would be a good team.
Shadow and Myrk, you should really consider this, or something along these lines.
Shadow and Myrk, you should really consider this, or something along these lines.
Re: Proposed 9th team
This would be a dope team
However I don't think I've ever seen success from a "proposal" or "rabble squad of remaining players" team ever. Someone should take a leadership role and see what players they can collect from this.
There are a few other potentials of course.
And as always, while the goal of the upper tier teams in MWC is to "Win"
the goal of lower tier teams is to provide at least one upset in the tournament, if not more. That is what it has always been for lower tier teams. While some players, sure, want to 'win it all'; the value of a team that is not in consideration to win at all should be striving for upset games and upset matches. They can do it.
even when we had 32 teams in 2006 (ok, about 28 after you don't acknowledge the dummy teams), you know what happened? TCOX, who was ranked out of the top 4 (for sure), made it to 2nd place. While tcox had very little chance of beating the overpowered Np 06 squad (who also had grim and arz, two of tcox's most important players), they beat teams they were predicted to lose against (starting with nfdf, then Smurf Legion, then BIA3 , then BME) and became top bracket champions. Tcox might have averaged lower in Point differentials compared to nfdf, bia3, and bme, but it was an underdog performance rising to the top no doubt.
That is what is valued in underdog squads. This is what I'd like to see.
I could see this roster beating 2/8 of the rosters in this tournament (FOR SURE) if effort and performance were managed properly.
However I don't think I've ever seen success from a "proposal" or "rabble squad of remaining players" team ever. Someone should take a leadership role and see what players they can collect from this.
There are a few other potentials of course.
And as always, while the goal of the upper tier teams in MWC is to "Win"
the goal of lower tier teams is to provide at least one upset in the tournament, if not more. That is what it has always been for lower tier teams. While some players, sure, want to 'win it all'; the value of a team that is not in consideration to win at all should be striving for upset games and upset matches. They can do it.
even when we had 32 teams in 2006 (ok, about 28 after you don't acknowledge the dummy teams), you know what happened? TCOX, who was ranked out of the top 4 (for sure), made it to 2nd place. While tcox had very little chance of beating the overpowered Np 06 squad (who also had grim and arz, two of tcox's most important players), they beat teams they were predicted to lose against (starting with nfdf, then Smurf Legion, then BIA3 , then BME) and became top bracket champions. Tcox might have averaged lower in Point differentials compared to nfdf, bia3, and bme, but it was an underdog performance rising to the top no doubt.
That is what is valued in underdog squads. This is what I'd like to see.
I could see this roster beating 2/8 of the rosters in this tournament (FOR SURE) if effort and performance were managed properly.
Re: Proposed 9th team
Sorry to burst your bubble but TCox in 06 was not a bunch of average players (how many of the 06 team were on the 07 team that was considered super stacked that year?), yes they got a couple nice upsets but beating nfdf and smurfs was an upset to noone.
Re: Proposed 9th team
Wan't that the year they were called "NPCox"?
-
- Posts: 1694
- Joined: 15 Nov 2012, 15:38
- Contact:
Re: Proposed 9th team
npcox was '07 wasn't it?
-
- Posts: 272
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 16:12
- Contact:
Re: Proposed 9th team
Well in the context of that year - the '06 tcox team was definitely an underdog compared to BIA, BME, . They had guys like Ed, Karma (new @ that time), Carniflex, and that was Paris's breakout year as a good player - this was a "weaker" tcox team than the old cox teams with arz, grim.
PS even though trix played for kramer o:
PS even though trix played for kramer o:
Re: Proposed 9th team
I'm leaning towards just not playing. I wouldn't consider teaming with limp or zak, if I teamed with gkg again his team would have way too easy a time curb stomping everyone, and the other teams lack any kind of captain, so all options look to be a waste of time.
Re: Proposed 9th team
myrk, if i land ducky as cap, which im trying. play for WTC
Re: Proposed 9th team
Lol... the ducky captain cycle goes again. #1- he doesnt show up half the time (pretty bad to hinge your team on a busy player) #2- See his des strategy in MWC finals against NC, with a chance to win the match not only does he pick a light map (when tbc faired much better on dark vs NC) but on top of that he does arguably the worst strategy in the history of any important mwc match ever.
You are better off offering myrk the captain role, or any of your other players. Stop being so delusional.
You are better off offering myrk the captain role, or any of your other players. Stop being so delusional.
Re: Proposed 9th team
I actually have to agree with honkey. Ducky should never, ever captain again.
Re: Proposed 9th team
if Myrk capped that team over honkey, they would probably do a lot better in the long run.
Re: Proposed 9th team
myrk i sent you a message
Re: Proposed 9th team
I don't want to commit the time to captain.
Re: Proposed 9th team
Surprised you aren't considering playing for Tcox, they are supposedly added Zer to the roster who was on yesterday and I could see CW fitting well with that roster as well (not sure if that is something they have looked into). Also Gamer is a solid captain.
If you and cw were to play for tcox I think you guys could contend for winning it all.
If you and cw were to play for tcox I think you guys could contend for winning it all.
Re: Proposed 9th team
East Wind wrote:Well in the context of that year - the '06 tcox team was definitely an underdog compared to BIA, BME, . They had guys like Ed, Karma (new @ that time), Carniflex, and that was Paris's breakout year as a good player - this was a "weaker" tcox team than the old cox teams with arz, grim.
PS even though trix played for kramer o:
nah trix played for kramer in 2005 when kramer was on HoA and trix was on Bia2
Re: Proposed 9th team
so HoA cheated in their victory vs my team in a series that game down to the final game? I'll count that as a win and bottom bracket final appearance for The Living End.
-
- Posts: 736
- Joined: 17 Nov 2012, 11:40
- Contact:
Re: Proposed 9th team
I'd rather play with Ducky, if possible, and have fun.
Re: Proposed 9th team
The last time I played on a team with Zer he shit the bed repeatedly, cost us games, and then publicly blamed me for his own screwups. No thanks.
Prior to his addition I considered joining tcox since they have some good players, but they still lack a captain.
I'm just not one bit interested in playing to get 4th place.
Prior to his addition I considered joining tcox since they have some good players, but they still lack a captain.
I'm just not one bit interested in playing to get 4th place.
Re: Proposed 9th team
MYRK the point in playing is to have fun in a competitive challange. so underdogs have more fun than if u were on a stacked team where its easy as shit to win. makes u try harder and step up ur game. if u just are looking to secure 1st place u might as well just say i joined the top stacked team and i won first place and not play at all. make it a challange and join the underdogs. make sure its with players u like to play with thats half the fun.
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: 17 Jan 2013, 22:50
- Contact:
Re: Proposed 9th team
There you go. Like I said happens.Myrk wrote: I'm just not one bit interested in playing to get 4th place.
