Honkey wrote:Chron is 10x better than flat and would have been a top 15 pick. I don't really care that Chron played, however on hveg I thought it was actually flat playing the flank that won the game for them. Certainly would have paid a lot more attention to Chron as he has some top notch clicks. So it does make a difference. But in actuality if we hadn't made some stupid plays we still should have won the match, we were just completely off in the teamwork department.
But to Nswer the question, yes pk Chron improves that roster much much more than flatline.
"would have been a top 15 pick" "on Honkey's Big Board of Honkey's Perspective of Myth"
I had more trouble showing up working the fields than when I wasn't at school, than now that I'm here.
5 games>4 games.
How's selling rip-off insurance to elderly people who are going to die in about 10 years so you can make a living, going for your choice of employment?
Good prediction, thanks for the double-U'z. I wish I could have captained against you instead of THOR but you couldn't even give me that respect.
But anyway lets talk about differences of what happened in the match, rather than personal perspectives of the top 15 players in the tournament. You know I would buy you a few brews at the bar, so I realize you aren't as thick as some of the other players on this game when it comes to discussing optional matters.
I guess
the difference is, that you speak of, we could have had cremisi using my account, and I could be playing on cremisi's account. That way, while everyone would think cremisi isn't actually baiting an opponent, and is really too stupid to be making moves that weren't totally obvious for a pinch, I could have cremisi's units, keep that in mind, and use that to my advantage.
I consider this an actual likely situation, because there are plenty of times I have heard a player say "Cremisi is absolutely fucking stupid, Cremisi is a dumbass, Cremisi can't match up 1v1 with me", therefore allowing Cremisi to have a tactical asset in being able to bait players who think they can just
"FATHER XMAS" his units.
Then again
if I captain the team I can just move cremisi's units and have that same effect. The same with flatline's or anyone elses. It is the counter to the FATHER XMAS strategy That is why the Captain role is a very unique role in team player, compared to the other players. Notice that GKG has to captain the team for it to win, and when he had someone else captain the team his lack of control over the game would have pushed him to stop playing/caring at the time.
In fact, I can always help CREMISI micro his melee's and units, as a captain with control of his teammates units, and baby rape players who aren't giving cremisi's units the micro-ing respect that some players demand.
It's the same effect with Sp or SF having different aliases, and those were two championship caliber teams. Dummying was illegal in those tournaments, and stated to be illegal in the rules of those tournaments. (11 years apart)
(the game "Flatline won", he suicided a few units, snuck around the enemy completely after listening to my orders, and dope dicked your flag.)
The plan was put into action by me, and executed successfully. Flatline has a negative damage ratio, and a negative kill ratio from that match. Did Flatline really hold (and execute) a tactical advantage that people knew he was Flatline? I don't think so.
I think the better argument here is that Chron was playing on Rawr's account but I won't get into it.
Ah fuck it, I will.
The weird dichotomy of the person "at fault" is the one who is liable and they can basically not pay if they don't have the money is pretty stupid. There's a good reason I think why liability insurance is required in Canada and probably some states.
Maybe you could have beaten them without Chron last week, but unfortunately now we don't know.