For sure on the first point, but it's like cherry-picking in basketball. Getting good damage while coming in last in koth is borderline depressing to mention, so it's pretty weird when someone that no one doubts is good feels the need to point it out. There was certainly nothing brilliant gameplay-wise going on.GiantKillerGen wrote:uhm, everyone has pointed out amusing stats during the post-game from time to time for any kind of game, since the dawn of myth. I thought that was just part of the game, but I guess everyone cares about their overall stats record then.
i have no idea what rabble ffas you are even talking about, don't care.
maybe I care about my stats in random rabble games, or maybe I am just in the mood for killing people when I can't get anyone to 1v1 me, and ffa games are the only games around. I wonder which is more likely.
Games mightve been a week ago? I dont know either, but it was remarkable because it was (a) genuine ffa in that # players was <= # starts, and (b) there were 2-3 good players throughout, yourself excluded. There was also a terrible player who, for various reasons, wasn't the one getting padded from and had some flukey luck.
Actually, I saved (temporarily) 2 films in particular because your losing streak (like, bottom half if not last) seemed so anomolous that I wanted to see if you were trying weird trades or new formations. At least 2 of the 4+ games definitely fit in the have-a-good-fight-and-fuck-the-gametype-(because you didn't win efficiently enough) situation.