Page 1 of 1
Should LSO be a Top 50 Player of All Time?
Posted: 28 Aug 2016, 19:40
by DBSeeker
He did just beat 5 TOP 50 PLAYERS without the aid of a single Top 50 player on a roster.
This is the most impressive achievement in Myth history.
My thoughts are clear: GKG's list is bad because it doesn't feature LSO.
Re: Should LSO be a Top 50 Player of All Time?
Posted: 28 Aug 2016, 23:43
by adrenaline
I realize this is a joke, but clearly you haven't watched the films

Re: Should LSO be a Top 50 Player of All Time?
Posted: 29 Aug 2016, 00:09
by Giant Killer General
i wonder how we are counting 5 top 50 players on itnh and 0 on GoM. quite the trolljob.
it was a bit of an upset to be sure. Still not nearly as big of an upset as wtc over tmns in mwc13 though. count the top-50 players in that match.
and who knows, maybe lso is on my top 50 list and we don't know it. he is a dummy after all.
Re: Should LSO be a Top 50 Player of All Time?
Posted: 29 Aug 2016, 05:39
by adrenaline
I've heard his voice and he sounds like a 14 yr old kid. Mildly retarded, perhaps, but probably not a dummy.
Re: Should LSO be a Top 50 Player of All Time?
Posted: 29 Aug 2016, 13:17
by sasper
does anyone even play this shit anymore?
LSO is a kid almost as bad as edulus. i know its a troll post but nevertheless laughable
Re: Should LSO be a Top 50 Player of All Time?
Posted: 29 Aug 2016, 13:22
by sasper
i was thinking that LSO could be zak intentionally playing shit but i doubt it
Re: Should LSO be a Top 50 Player of All Time?
Posted: 29 Aug 2016, 19:46
by Lord---Scary Owl
sasper wrote:does anyone even play this shit anymore?
LSO is a kid almost as bad as edulus. i know its a troll post but nevertheless laughable
dude edulus is several levels lower than me, I do understand that this is a Seeker level troll post but you are crazy closer to edulus than me
you are quite worse at captaining and haven't played in a year or so to see me play
also im not a dummy account and zak hates me