Page 1 of 1
newskin
Posted: 09 Jan 2016, 01:54
by sasper
after his short lived career as a narcissistic crackhead came to a sad and pathetic end, what ever happened to myth's favourite delinquent cretin, newskin. in any case, i think it's safe to say he won't be missed.
Re: newskin
Posted: 09 Jan 2016, 03:31
by argos
you can find him on fb
Re: newskin
Posted: 09 Jan 2016, 13:09
by BIG KROK V8 SS
park bench
Re: newskin
Posted: 17 Jan 2016, 23:07
by liger <3
lol newskin
Re: newskin
Posted: 17 Jan 2016, 23:09
by Pogue
Looking at his profile on fb just makes me hope that he dies in a fire. What a fucking waste of space that loser is.
Re: newskin
Posted: 17 Jan 2016, 23:34
by boomboXx
That guy is on a parkbench asking old fat men if he can suck them for $5.
Re: newskin
Posted: 18 Jan 2016, 00:43
by switch
Newskin's facebook no longer exists, unless he made another one.
Never4get
Re: newskin
Posted: 18 Jan 2016, 14:24
by par73
im pretty sure he is in jail for credit fraud or something along those lines. wouldn't be surprised if he was also seeking treatment for mental health. he had a bad case of america
Re: newskin
Posted: 18 Jan 2016, 15:06
by sharkdrivingabus
Back in like 2006 or 2007 I was driving through Connecticut and I stopped for coffee with Newskin. We stopped by his house too for a bit and I met his family. They were super nice and it was a really wholesome all America feel. It makes me feel sad to see all the shit he puts on Facebook. I hope he's just trolling, because he threw away a lot of great support if the meth and heroin shit is actually a real thing.
Re: newskin
Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 05:37
by Pogue
I remember that he apparently took a bunch of nudes that were just of him sitting on a stool. Wtf was WRONG with that clown?
Re: newskin
Posted: 20 Jan 2016, 02:49
by Cutard
Zak, your one job was to give us updates about newskin. Where the hell are you?
Re: newskin
Posted: 20 Jan 2016, 15:51
by Zak
https://mobile.twitter.com/shawnspencer_
Apparently he gave up on social media, too many internet trolls
Re: newskin
Posted: 20 Jan 2016, 18:32
by Cutard
If you were a real man you'd be searching the federal prisoner database for Shawn Spencer.
Re: newskin
Posted: 20 Jan 2016, 23:45
by Lord---Scary Owl
Re: newskin
Posted: 21 Jan 2016, 01:14
by rearview
what the hell? this guy is on a parkbench.
Re: newskin
Posted: 21 Jan 2016, 01:50
by Pogue
Well, he was on the streets a few months ago lol
[youtube]
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l3VuNe_PIoI[/youtube]
Re: newskin
Posted: 21 Jan 2016, 02:11
by rearview
poor newskin, he could've become a crack dealer instead of a street bum
Re: newskin
Posted: 21 Jan 2016, 03:28
by BIG KROK V8 SS
LOL holy shit what a waste of life. addiction is weak.
Re: newskin
Posted: 21 Jan 2016, 04:50
by adrenaline
Re: newskin
Posted: 21 Jan 2016, 05:02
by adrenaline
lol this IncantationNYDM guy really has it in for Newskin lol... pretty funny shit actually.
Re: newskin
Posted: 21 Jan 2016, 06:24
by wwo
http://titchesbebrippin.blogspot.com/20 ... agment_=#!
You see, the thing about high school girls… is that Shawn never grew out of them.
Re: newskin
Posted: 21 Jan 2016, 20:33
by Cutard
Well that's really goddamn sad.
Re: newskin
Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 05:07
by switch
[youtube]
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xc1Mo7NA4u8[/youtube]
Newskin has entered the final phase of his life as an internet personality. In this phase the contradictions of his career as a party icon and agent of controversy collapse, leading to his eventual replacement by younger, more photogenic icons. In the endgame, newskin dissapears completely, swallowed by the superficial drug addeled hell he helped create. In the final scene, his faustian haters exact their revenge, dragging newskin with them to hades.
[youtube]
https://youtube.com/watch?v=VeW7T5Q5mhI[/youtube]
If hes not to share the fate of narcissus, Newskin will somehow have to breakthrough the mirrors of his own ego that chain him to his fantasy, to emerge reborn on the other side.

Re: newskin
Posted: 24 Jan 2016, 06:42
by Zak
Re: newskin
Posted: 24 Jan 2016, 07:16
by Pogue
Cutard wrote:
Well that's really goddamn sad.
Is it Cu? I can't be the only one that hopes this fucking loser is dead in a dumpster somewhere. Guy was a complete and utter idiot.
Re: newskin
Posted: 24 Jan 2016, 14:32
by BIG KROK V8 SS
Nobody is born addicted to that shit. He made that choice. He is weak. He deserves the consequences of the outcome. He can turn his life around if he wants to. Same goes for people who kill themselves. It was their choice. I do not feel bad for them.
Re: newskin
Posted: 27 Jan 2016, 03:54
by Lizard King
Holy crap. I was pals with him back in the day for quite some time, I had no idea his life had derailed like this. Makes me wonder what's happened to a lot of the other old school mythers.
Re: newskin
Posted: 27 Jan 2016, 07:49
by sasper
BIG KROK V8 SS wrote:Nobody is born addicted to that shit. He made that choice. He is weak. He deserves the consequences of the outcome. He can turn his life around if he wants to. Same goes for people who kill themselves. It was their choice. I do not feel bad for them.
yes they are. if a mother shoots up during pregnancy the baby is born addicted.
Re: newskin
Posted: 27 Jan 2016, 13:13
by BIG KROK V8 SS
sasper wrote:BIG KROK V8 SS wrote:Nobody is born addicted to that shit. He made that choice. He is weak. He deserves the consequences of the outcome. He can turn his life around if he wants to. Same goes for people who kill themselves. It was their choice. I do not feel bad for them.
yes they are. if a mother shoots up during pregnancy the baby is born addicted.
So the baby is born addicted and the mother supplies them with drugs their entire life? You're an idiot.
Re: newskin
Posted: 27 Jan 2016, 22:50
by Pogue
Sometimes I feel like sasper is actually donnie.
Re: newskin
Posted: 28 Jan 2016, 00:07
by BIG KROK V8 SS
So after 18 years of the kid being drug-free, the kid suddenly becomes addicted to drugs once they try it? No. That's called being weak and making poor life decisions. Becoming addicted to a substance is a choice. Being born with Autism is not a choice.
Re: newskin
Posted: 28 Jan 2016, 02:55
by sharkdrivingabus
Have you read any of the literature on the subject krok? There's a lot of evidence to support that addiction is driven by genetics.
Re: newskin
Posted: 28 Jan 2016, 03:34
by BIG KROK V8 SS
Yes. I have a Masters in Psych. That is all relative. Its like the argument of being born gay vs choosing to be gay. Being gay isn't essential for survival. There is nothing within our genetics that would make someone be born no attracted to the opposite sex; because that is the attraction vital for reproduction. Its a choice. Are there other factors that go into it, as far as genetic makeup and what not? Yes. But it comes down to actively making a choice. You mean to tell me someone who has never drank nor done drugs is addicted to a substance just because of genetics? How is that even possible? They were exposed to it, liked the sensation, and their genetic weakness is the reason they are not able to easily come off of it. Also, because the body then begins to crave that drug and addiction.
My point is, if it was never started in the first place, you can't be addicted. If it was once started, you can become addicted by choice, and also opens the door to relapsing.
Re: newskin
Posted: 28 Jan 2016, 05:10
by switch
; because that is the attraction vital for reproduction. Its a choice.
This is a ridiculous over simplification of natural selection. It is entirely conceivable that genetic predisposition for homosexuality exists and is in fact wide spread, and even selected for!
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... via%3Dihub
For example if homosexuality is widespread in a group it produces preferential selection in favour of the remaining heterosexuals. This should be obvious from the example of machismo in modern civilization etc. Furthermore in pre monogamist groups there may have been no clear distinction, ie, bisexualism.
With regard to addiction to external substances humans have been ingesting drugs for pretty much our entire evolutionary history, see the stoned ape thoery etc. It is well known that addiction can be reinforced from inhereted genetics. In the modern context social pressure should not be discounted either. I don't think anyone studying the issue today would argue that addiction in entirely predetermined, but likewise it would be a mistake to ignore the genetic issue. Kirks argument doesn't really go anywhere beyond some kind of temperance exaltation. You know, pretty much everyone in western civilization is addicted to sugar and caffeine- does make all those junkies equivalent to heroin addicts? Are these people just weaklings in kirks view?
Now to be sure, I'm not suggesting this is or isnt he case with newskin. I have no idea. It could very well be purely egotistical narcissism. Who knows.
Re: newskin
Posted: 28 Jan 2016, 14:28
by BIG KROK V8 SS
I am addicted to coffee. If I wanted to stop, I could choose to. But it wakes me up and alleviates my headaches. Switch, I've numerous time spent in the field on gender studies, addiction, and abnormal behavior. While all these addictions and diagnoses deserve to be treated like a real disease, I am still disagreeing with the fact that people are born addicted to a substance, or favor homosexuality upon birth. It doesn't make sense. You don't see that across any other living beings out there, and if you do, its a freak thing. If people were genetically made to be attracted to the same sex, we wouldn't have the necessary tools for survival. Its about basic logic and instincts, and that's what I'm arguing. I'm not throwing shit at the wall hoping it will stick, I actually know what I'm talking about. Its not what people want to hear; everyone wants a scientific theory for why they act the way they do or to give them a handicap belief for the issues that they have. Genetic predisposition I do believe and understand, but there are certain things that come down to simple nurture and choice.
Re: newskin
Posted: 29 Jan 2016, 00:03
by DBSeeker
Kirk owned this debate. Good job.
Re: newskin
Posted: 31 Jan 2016, 02:25
by valentine
krok only reads sex books
Re: newskin
Posted: 31 Jan 2016, 03:09
by Lord---Scary Owl
"necessary tools for survival"
making it sound like we are equipped with pitchforks and shovels
Re: newskin
Posted: 31 Jan 2016, 04:17
by BIG KROK V8 SS
Lord---Scary Owl wrote:"necessary tools for survival"
making it sound like we are equipped with pitchforks and shovels
You'll learn someday. But I'm pretty convinced most millennials will never understand anything in depth.
Re: newskin
Posted: 03 Feb 2016, 01:42
by Lord---Scary Owl
lol I understand perfectly. it was just your wording
Re: newskin
Posted: 03 Feb 2016, 04:08
by Pogue
BIG KROK V8 SS wrote:Lord---Scary Owl wrote:"necessary tools for survival"
making it sound like we are equipped with pitchforks and shovels
You'll learn someday. But I'm pretty convinced most millennials will never understand anything in depth.
Millennials really are the dumbest fucking generation ever. Sense of entitlement, no work ethic, shit taste in movies, music, literature, no idea how to actually date someone, retarded as all fuck political views, zero attention span. Hopefully a solar flare vaporizes the planet soon or we're proper fucked, oh nvm we already are

Re: newskin
Posted: 04 Feb 2016, 04:23
by wwo
Pogue thinking about the future... Must've gotten some slattern knocked up again.
Re: newskin
Posted: 04 Feb 2016, 04:28
by Pogue
wwo wrote:Pogue thinking about the future... Must've gotten some slattern knocked up again.
Hell no, I got a vasectomy two years ago.
Re: newskin
Posted: 04 Feb 2016, 06:57
by dac
Pogue wrote:wwo wrote:Pogue thinking about the future... Must've gotten some slattern knocked up again.
Hell no, I got a vasectomy two years ago.
damn dude didnt know they could make incisions that small.
but yeah, yay for retarded millenials. Feeling the Bern. fml.
Re: newskin
Posted: 28 Jun 2016, 06:51
by Verminix2
LOL