Page 3 of 3
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 20:35
by Giant Killer General
And you didn't have adren in that match. It was very much comparable, you are fucking crazy.
I am saying something because YOU brought this upon yourself with your ridiculous defense of the salary cap over many many many posts earlier.
Now it is just way too fun to point your idiocy out to everyone.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 20:36
by Zak
Asmo wrote:I do agree your team is getting screwed. According to my ratings your team would be allowed (other than one 3 baller you would have to cut).
GiantKillerGen wrote:That roster is stronger than NC's roster last year. Which is no surprise, because NC has always been the biggest perpetrators of team stacking which is why I left them (I actually got booted from them).
Asmo wrote:Lol, yeah this current NC roster is better than any of the rosters NC has had the past two years...
Why would you push a salary cap so hard and then try to pull off a team stack like this? dumb dumb dumb
This is an fine example of the kind of yes-men that GKG surrounds himself with, in order to continue living within his own reality bubble.
Asmo felt like our team was fine (and felt we got screwed by the ratings changes), then GKG chimes in with a different opinion, and then asmo quickly corrects his statement by declaring how stacked we are.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 20:37
by Giant Killer General
trollllllllllllllolololololololollololollol
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 20:39
by ska
Look what I brouuuught...

Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 20:45
by Zak
GiantKillerGen wrote:trollllllllllllllolololololololollololollol
Please do explain how
ska
sam
limp
shai
zak
august
captain
are able to win a match vs
gkg
paris
east wind
homer
PK
browning
GK
cruniac
Other than through some horrible captaining from your team.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 20:48
by Asmodian
thisforumsucks wrote:Asmo wrote:shai: 4 = shai
adren: 5 = adren
limp: 4 < rabican
sam: 4 < tirri
ska: 4 = ska
Nemesis: 4 never showed
Zak: 3 = zak
August: 3 < Flatline
Captain: 3 never showed
Blard: 3 < enculator
Sevendust: 3 wtf?
You honestly believe rab is better than limp? lol
Captain did show up, for at least 3/4 of our games. It doesn't matter if nemesis never showed if he was on the roster. There is no guarantee that ska, rab, tirri, or flat will make games, considering their level of interest in MWC and conflicting time zones/work schedules.
Yes, Rabican is better than limp.
Those guys always show for tournaments.
GTFO of here with this "level of interest" crap. That is an awful excuse to use. If you show up for a match are you going to try and lose it? NO; hence you are TRYING to win. People who use the excuse of "care level" yet show up to mwc matches are full of shit.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 20:50
by Zak
Asmo wrote:
Yes, Rabican is better than limp.
I'm sure this has nothing to do with you getting bullied by limp in lobbies and games?
Especially not after accusing flatline of disliking you because you out-trowed him months ago...
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 20:56
by Asmodian
bullied by limp?... just lol. I don't care what people say about me that know little to nothing about my life. The words hold no weight at all.
Rabican is just better than Limp. Look at the replays of limp's team vs Team GKG. Rabican was Team Limp's best player 4/5 games.
Especially not after accusing flatline of disliking you because you out-trowed him months ago...
uhhh that wasn't the situation at all. I never trowed against Flat, you are just talking out of your ass with having no background knowledge on what went down...infact there is no bad blood between me and flat that I know of.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 21:26
by adrenaline
Just skimmed through all that quickly... just want to point out that August is much better than anyone here seems to give him credit for. much much better. Easily 4 balls when he gets active.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 21:31
by Aki
GiantKillerGen wrote:I am pointing out your hypocrisy for all the world to see.
what a dweeb
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 21:32
by Giant Killer General
I agree adren.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 22:19
by Asmodian
Asmo wrote:
I do agree your team is getting screwed. According to my ratings your team would be allowed (other than one 3 baller you would have to cut).
I still stand by this, I think you guys are getting screwed because I think the salary cap is stupid and you should be able to play with who you want to.
Asmo wrote:
Lol, yeah this current NC roster is better than any of the rosters NC has had the past two years...
Why would you push a salary cap so hard and then try to pull off a team stack like this? dumb dumb dumb
For a
SALARY CAP (yeah that thing you wanted) your team is indeed stacked, there is a reason you would be forced to cut 2 4 ballers and a 3 baller under the current system.
Maybe don't defend a salary cap for 10 pages long in a thread and then bitch and cry about it when it doesn't work out for you to stack your team.
You argued for a salary cap for balance and a "more competitive tournament" but now you are trying to do everything within your power to make your team as unbalanced and stacked as possible under the rules.
^^^^^
Words/actions of hypocrisy right there.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 04 May 2013, 23:49
by Dantski
who cares about MWC games, I'm here for the MWC forum
shinco
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 05 May 2013, 03:49
by Pogue
Dantski wrote:who cares about MWC games, I'm here for the MWC forum
shinco
Pretty much sums me up.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 05 May 2013, 21:23
by Ratking
While I appreciate the vote of confidence on the team building thing, I'm lacking in time and motivation to continue doing it. I believe I posted about this when TWS was starting, but for the sake of the tournament went ahead and did it anyway. Plus a draft is so much easier for me.
Add in being capped by gkg and playing with guys like ew and August.. It's really quite perfect. The only thing missing from he equation is cremisi

Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 06 May 2013, 01:57
by Pogue
Ratking wrote:
Add in being capped by gkg and playing with guys like ew and August.. It's really quite perfect.
You must be going through a lot of containers of anal lube.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 06 May 2013, 04:30
by Zak
I think headhunter should be a 2
Milk man as well, he's not on this list I noticed.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 06 May 2013, 12:02
by c⁄J⁄Iılk c⁄J⁄Iån ◊§t◊
Adren should be a 4 imho. He has a life & can't cap. This is especially true if EW is a 4.
I think you could def drop some players from 3 to 2 (val, 10, hh, xmas) and some others from 2 to 1 (some of the gru and toads are definitely no better than bunny or edulus) to even things out.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 06 May 2013, 12:52
by adrenaline
I can cap just fine if i choose to. I just prefer to heavy hit.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 06 May 2013, 14:39
by dac
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 06 May 2013, 15:43
by c⁄J⁄Iılk c⁄J⁄Iån ◊§t◊
Oh thanks for reminding me cracka.
Dac should also be added to the list as a 1.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 07 May 2013, 02:36
by wwo
Asmo wrote:
GTFO of here with this "level of interest" crap. That is an awful excuse to use. If you show up for a match are you going to try and lose it? NO; hence you are TRYING to win. People who use the excuse of "care level" yet show up to mwc matches are full of shit.
Whether someone can show up and play isn't connected to whether they care or not. Entire teams throughout mwc prove that. Winning is the default goal of playing at all in any circumstance, but it doesn't have to hold any kind of motivating importance.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 07 May 2013, 03:17
by Zak
wwo wrote:Asmo wrote:
GTFO of here with this "level of interest" crap. That is an awful excuse to use. If you show up for a match are you going to try and lose it? NO; hence you are TRYING to win. People who use the excuse of "care level" yet show up to mwc matches are full of shit.
Whether someone can show up and play isn't connected to whether they care or not. Entire teams throughout mwc prove that. Winning is the default goal of playing at all in any circumstance, but it doesn't have to hold any kind of motivating importance.
Agreed, or else people would always be rated by the level of skill they achieved at their peak, as opposed to what they play like today.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 07 May 2013, 03:30
by par73
the peak is an illusion of being in the right place at the right time
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 07 May 2013, 03:55
by c⁄J⁄Iılk c⁄J⁄Iån ◊§t◊
par73 wrote:the peak is an illusion of being in the right place at the right time
Which begs the question... is presentness possible?
...sorry, writing papers.

Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 08 May 2013, 19:07
by Captain
Why am I 3 balls? I haven't played since I don't remember and I shoot liquid LSD into my neck with a needle.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 09 May 2013, 14:39
by Sormiron
Captain wrote:Why am I 3 balls? I haven't played since I don't remember and I shoot liquid LSD into my neck with a needle.
for the same reason I am got 3 balls. (realy I do)
it´s just a collective memmory of how you used to play. the 3 ball range is absurd anyhow.
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 09 May 2013, 16:12
by par73
idk, why am i 4 balls when i had the best sudden death finals performance. in the clutch i delivered.
200/696 total damage from 2 games.
STATISTICS
but then again, we all do not have to play this silly game
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 09 May 2013, 17:50
by Chohan
Captain wrote:Why am I 3 balls? I haven't played since I don't remember and I shoot liquid LSD into my neck with a needle.
LOL CAPTAIN CADRE™
Re: The proposed ball ratings
Posted: 09 May 2013, 18:05
by Captain
Chohan wrote:Captain wrote:Why am I 3 balls? I haven't played since I don't remember and I shoot liquid LSD into my neck with a needle.
LOL CAPTAIN CADRE™
LOL CRUNEAC
You want to be my neighbor?