c⁄J⁄Iılk c⁄J⁄Iån ◊§t◊ wrote:How you can claim to know where I would or would not have placed in past years, given that I never included my own scores in the standings, is beyond me. The best I can do is assure you that I do indeed play to win regardless of my exclusion from the standings. I find playing ffas to win to be innately pleasurable and do not need extrinsic motivations to do so. Stop being a douche.
after some thought, I was going to come and edit my post and say "despite being critical of your choices, I applause and thank you for hosting the league" instead i will leave you with a lovely post because i actually had fun last night
lets take last year for example
milk man, 90 points, 12 wins, 90 losses
http://gateofstorms.net/tournaments/FFA2013
pretty funny how in this year's league you already have 11 wins in just two weeks.
chances are how you did in those first two years wouldn't have mattered in regards to the standings, whereas this year you're a true contender and in first place. You should pat yourself on the back.
If anything, you're doing your job as a host making the extrinsic goals related to the cut off of your event that much more difficult to achieve for your guests (as you have every other year). and for that, i applaud and thank thee. I'm happy to play some games with a few familiar faces, even though it'd be better if there were more, the level of chaos would probably remain the same or could even escalate. The joys of ffa
You really shouldn't be upset with your 'rig-o-nomics', they aren't upsetting anyone you name calling nancy. the least you could have done was acknowledge said riggery exists by simply how you are approaching the format, rather than asserting your motivation behind playing free for all games whether they are played in your league or not.
Dantski wrote:care.